North Carolina insurer claims tort reform lowered malpractice premiums.
The Raleigh (NC) News & Observer (4/16,
Jarvis, Christensen) reports, "A medical malpractice insurer has lowered
its premiums and is crediting what is often called tort reform in this and
other states. Mag Mutual Insurance Co., the second-largest such firm in the
state, credits the new laws with almost half of its recent 7.4 percent average
cut in insurance premiums for doctors. The legislature last year overrode Gov.
Bev Perdue's veto of a bill capping "noneconomic" damages at
$500,000." The president of N.C. Advocates for Justice countered by saying
that insurance companies "have long over-charged doctors, racking up huge
profits and using a fictional tort 'crisis' to limit the rights of those
catastrophically hurt by medical errors." He also faulted state political
leaders for not addressing "the real problem -- preventable medical errors
that leave scores of North Carolinians injured or dead."
Ohio insurance report shows decline in malpractice claims,
payments. The Columbus (OH) Dispatch (4/15, Johnson)
reported, "Ohio's tort-reform law is having a dramatic impact on medical
malpractice cases in the state, with closed claims dropping 41 percent between
2005 and 2010, and average payments declining 38 percent over that period. The
Ohio Department of Insurance annual report also shows more than 3 of 4 closed
claims resulted in no payment." An official with the Ohio State Medical
Association notes that malpractice premiums have fallen by over 26%, and points
to that as "proof that tort reform accomplished what it set out to do -
slow the growth of what we thought were runaway lawsuits and to stabilize the
market for physicians."
Advocates
say California shows tort reform may not lower premiums. In contrast, the
Center for Justice & Democracy's Pop Tort website (4/13) claims that the
experience of California shows that tort reform does not necessarily lower
insurance rates. It charges that the state's "medical malpractice
insurance industry has simply became bloated, with insurers paying out only
tiny percentages of the premiums they are collecting from doctors." It
hailed actions by the state's insurance commissioner to force lower rates, and
urged support for a ballot initiative that would extend the commissioner's rate
regulatory powers to the health insurance industry.
No comments:
Post a Comment