Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Lawsuit concerning burns from hot tea bears similarities to '92 coffee case.


www.med-art.com

The Detroit Free Press (12/10, Allyn, 280K) reports that a year ago, a passenger on a Southwest flight bound for Houston spilled hot water for a cup of tea into her lap and "suffered skin blisters and second-degree burns, according to her attorney Rob Anderson, who filed an $800,000 negligence lawsuit against Southwest on her behalf." According to the Free Press, the plaintiff did not have a drop-down table on which to place her cup of tea because she was sitting in the front row. The article notes that "the case echoes one involving a New Mexico woman who won a settlement after spilling a piping hot cup of McDonald's coffee on herself in 1992." The story goes on to say that although the 1992 case was cited by many advocates of tort reform as an example of greed and abuse in the civil justice system, many legal experts argue that the facts and outcome of the case were distorted by time and by propaganda. Daniel Clayton, a medical malpractice attorney, "said the propaganda about the case has helped marshal public opinion in favor of lawsuit reform," adding that such legislation ends up hurting those who have been harmed in some way. The article also describes the coffee case and its effects in further detail.

Thursday, December 06, 2012

Portable baby recliner comes under scrutiny following five infant deaths.


www.med-art.com

The AP (12/6, Kerr) reports that "the government is taking action against the makers of a portable baby recliner called the Nap Nanny after five infant deaths." The story notes that the US Consumer Product Safety Commission "filed an administrative complaint Wednesday alleging that the new model of the Nap Nanny, called the Chill, and two earlier versions 'pose a substantial risk of injury and death to infants.'" The CPSC is now "seeking an order that would require Nap Nanny maker Baby Matters LLC of Berwyn, Pa., to notify the public about what the agency deems a serious product defect," and it also wants the firm to offer consumers a full refund.
        The Boston Globe (12/6, Lipka, 250K) "Consumer Alert" blog reports that "The lawsuit was filed today against Baby Matters, LLC, of Berwyn, Pa., which makes Nap Nanny and Nap Nanny Chill. The CPSC said it was aware of the deaths of four infants in Nap Nanny Generation Two recliners and another in a Nap Nanny Chill." The blog post adds, "The first set of Nap Nanny recliners were recalled in July 2010 - and consumers were offered an $80 coupon for a newer model recliner as well as improve warnings and instructions."
        CNN (12/6, Sperry) reports on its website that "the Nap Nanny recliner is designed for sleeping, resting and playing and includes a shaped foam base with an inclined indentation for the baby to sit and a fitted fabric cover with a three-point harness," according to the CPSC. CPSC Commissioner Nancy Nord is quoted as saying, "My heart goes out to the parents and families of children who are injured or lose their lives in incidents associated with consumer products."
        USA Today (12/6, O'Donnell, 1.71M), Reuters (12/6) and the NBC News (12/6) website also cover this story.